 |
Duration: 00:28 minutes Upload Time: 2006-05-24 00:53:30 User: bowlingbinder43 :::: Favorites :::: Top Videos of Day |
|
Description: Not mine... |
|
Comments | |
| ModularPowerhouse ::: Favorites 2007-11-30 23:08:09 not a dumbshit there slick, i realize they didnt use those motors until 93. go fuck yourself. __________________________________________________ | |
| adammdamann ::: Favorites 2007-11-28 21:21:24 yeah thats wut i love about mustangs vs camaros and vets is u got a ton of options on the newer ones, for instantance u can have a v6 a 300 horse v8 a 320,345,500 and u have the saleens which have 330,460,and 550 horses and then u got the shelbys. and older ones u got the cobras. and soon another bullet. but yeah u gotta lvoe all the options __________________________________________________ | |
| 94gtvert ::: Favorites 2007-11-27 23:11:10 Yeah each year they change something up here or there. For example, 94-98 was the SN95 but the 5.0 was available only from 94-95, 96-98 had a 4.6 SOHC. There are also several options from year to year, in 01 there was the Bullit based off the Steve McQueen movie, 03-04 Mach 1 and there are countless options and all kinds of stuff from year to year. __________________________________________________ | |
| DiZzyBonne ::: Favorites 2007-11-27 06:20:25 This should answer all of your questions and more: en . wikipedia . org /wiki/Ford_Mustang There IS a difference in performance between them, just read up! It's an interesting and fun read, I promise you'll like it! __________________________________________________ | |
| adammdamann ::: Favorites 2007-11-26 21:12:37 oh so its jsut the body no difference in performance or anything? __________________________________________________ | |
| 94gtvert ::: Favorites 2007-11-26 17:12:27 "S197" is any 05 and newer Mustang. It's the body identifications. 79-93 was the "Fox" body, 94-98 was "SN95" 99-04 was "SN95 New Edge" __________________________________________________ | |
| saleen2813 ::: Favorites 2007-11-23 11:11:55 hell yeah sounds good __________________________________________________ | |
| adammdamann ::: Favorites 2007-11-23 00:25:32 wuts the s197? __________________________________________________ | |
| led0zeppelin1977 ::: Favorites 2007-11-23 00:15:03 theyre about the same output, t/s is easier to put in. whipple and kenne bell have much higher tuning capacities while saleen and procharger dont, saleen is very easy on the eyes and theyre coming out with a beautiful ram-air s/c. kenne bell and whipple, from what ive seen are about equal, ive seen the whipple and then kenne bell crowds put out some sick hp. either of those two, you cant go wrong __________________________________________________ | |
| scorpiojudo ::: Favorites 2007-11-21 17:58:21 I'm picking up an 08 gt next week this was great info from everybody, what's the diference in hp gains with the centrifugal as with the twin screw? how much does the kenne bell and whipple put out compared to the saleen and the procharger. why is kennebell the best? __________________________________________________ | |
| miserybusiness666 ::: Favorites 2007-11-20 11:55:27 jesus tity fucking christ. but the real question here is?? is it fast??' ahahahahahahah __________________________________________________ | |
| led0zeppelin1977 ::: Favorites 2007-11-15 15:54:00 get a whipple or kenne bell. saleens look nice, but ive heard of a lot of installation problems and whipple and kenne bell have the best power potential. and unless its a total track car, dont get a centrifugal supercharger, make sure its a twin screw s/c. with cams and a supercharger, youre going to be making a lot of power, even supercharger alone, our cars can only handle up to about 450 before you need to buy forged internals __________________________________________________ | |
| gasshole82 ::: Favorites 2007-11-15 03:18:11 take it easy man, don't kill yourself. Do it at the track. it's awesome to see a 15 year old own a camaro and not a honda. Im glad you saw the light right away. __________________________________________________ | |
| ronniej1183 ::: Favorites 2007-11-15 00:30:54 no, your $300 pile of Mullet goodness is not 'badass', it's a hick ass shitbox... go back inside your trailer and leave the internet alone. thanks. __________________________________________________ | |
| papaown ::: Favorites 2007-10-28 09:05:50 wow modular your a real dumbshit aren't you lol... yes 87 camaros suck, and no they didn't have lt1's Lt1s appeared in the 93-97 formulas..trans ams...and camaros ls1 started in 98 __________________________________________________ | |
No comments:
Post a Comment