Duration: 11:46 minutes Upload Time: 2007-04-23 21:45:14 User: Gravitationalist :::: Favorites :::: Top Videos of Day |
|
Description: Where did we come from? The history of cosmology from flat earth to Big Bang: Eratosthenes and Ptolemy, Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo, Newton, Edwin Hubble. |
|
Comments | |
sciencemile ::: Favorites 2007-11-03 22:05:18 None taken, good sir. 1. Yes, thank you. 2. 500 words really is too small of a limit, it doesn't allow you to make your point fully, hmm? 3. Yes, he wanted a static universe, because that would make it easier to predict things. Unfortunately, what he wanted and what existed were totally different lol. __________________________________________________ | |
bobbygnosis ::: Favorites 2007-11-03 22:00:33 Also, no offence: 1. Scientists do not keep hypotheses. Hypotheses are only useful during one phase of inquiry. 2. Scientific method is values. Organization of values is metaphysics. Scientists and their actions are subject to philosophic examination whether by sientists, legal orgaizatios or casual observers. 3. Einstein did not say that his theory of relativity was incorrect. Only that his comological constant was incorrect. He wanted a static universe. __________________________________________________ | |
sciencemile ::: Favorites 2007-11-03 21:58:28 At the same time, this applies to God as well, but God has chosen to no longer affect the material world, and in my opinion, the zealots of any belief shall recieve their respective damnation, religious or otherwise. __________________________________________________ | |
sciencemile ::: Favorites 2007-11-03 21:58:00 I don't trust anything, not even science, unless it provides me with proof. Faith is not required for the laws of the universe to take effect. An example would be a train crashing into a car. You may not hear the train coming (and many don't), but you don't have to believe in the train for it to kill you. __________________________________________________ | |
bobbygnosis ::: Favorites 2007-11-03 21:44:55 Technically, this is untrue: Science cannot keep anything as it is an intellectual pattern - not a conciousness. People make sciences and labs just as people make religions and churches. Religions and labs don't make themselves any more than religions and churches. So niehter sciences and labs nor religions and churches are capable of doing anything. Ironically believingin science takes just as much faith as believing in God. __________________________________________________ | |
exupstreetfighter ::: Favorites 2007-11-01 05:05:28 "Science without religion is lame,religion without science is blind" Mr Albert Einstien __________________________________________________ | |
layo83 ::: Favorites 2007-07-20 15:08:35 When Dr. Hawkings said he felt a connection with newton, but then admitted thaat there were, of course, a million people born that day, I almost got chocked up, what modesty. __________________________________________________ | |
sciencemile ::: Favorites 2007-06-19 01:50:39 Anyone else feel inspired when they watch these videos? __________________________________________________ | |
sciencemile ::: Favorites 2007-06-19 01:47:21 Fortunately, Science doesn't have to take everything that scientists say to heart, if it does not make sense; Science keeps only the inferences, theories, and hypotheses that work, and do not need to follow the whole of a Philosopher's guidance. Which is why we still use the Theory of Relativity, despite Einstein saying that it was incorrect. __________________________________________________ | |
apolyak1 ::: Favorites 2007-05-31 23:04:31 Like i said before, I beleive in God and not just in science, and vice versa. I just want to spread the truth. Einstein himself once said "Science witohught religion makes no sence, and religion withought science makes no sence". __________________________________________________ | |
apolyak1 ::: Favorites 2007-05-31 23:03:49 "He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth, and its people are like grasshoppers..." Isaiah 40:22 (By the way, the Hebrew language at that time didnt have a word for "sphere," only for "circle"). Also, in Luke 17:34--36 Christ's Second Coming is portrayed as occurring while some are asleep at night and others are working at daytime activities which means a rotating earth with day and night at the same time. __________________________________________________ | |
metalgearsolidrulez ::: Favorites 2007-05-31 16:20:08 i read the bible this is what is says:(im getting this from some bible website.) In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. 2The earth was without form and void, and darkness was over the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters. Does not say anything about it form just no form whick basicly means it is not 3d so people though it was flat __________________________________________________ | |
apolyak1 ::: Favorites 2007-05-30 20:49:21 First of all bud, I dont mean to be mean but, the bable says nothing about the world being flat. Actually, the first two verses actually says that the earth is round. "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters." That was from Genisis 1-2. I believe in God and in science, so please dont say things about somthing you dont know about. Thanks. __________________________________________________ | |
cryptographix ::: Favorites 2007-05-14 10:37:28 You always upload great videos! Thanks! __________________________________________________ | |
metalgearsolidrulez ::: Favorites 2007-04-28 19:08:55 christains belived earth is flat.... bible is incorrect in everything all it is, is that follow its storys like dont kill, dont steal, dont lie those stuff nothing else __________________________________________________ |
Friday, January 18, 2008
Stephen Hawking's Universe - EP1:Seeing Is Believing (3/ 5)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment