First,Second,Third&Fourth Crusades=First World War of Troy

	Duration: 06:37 minutes Upload Time: 06-06-24 04:19:18 User: mithec :::: Favorites :::: Top Videos of Day
Description: Homer's "Iliad" tells the tale of the First Crusade. When we think of Homer's Troy, we imagine it in fantasy hues of times long gone. And yet the latest research conducted of one of the world's leading mathematicians proves it to us irrefutably: what we know as the "Trojan War" was in fact the First Crusade! CLICK ON AMAZON.COM LINK! We aren't talking about obvious parallels between two major military campaigns separated by millennia - the Trojan War and the First Crusade are but different names of one and the same military campaign. The former ended up in the distant past due to the blatantly erroneous chronology that we use - one that was created by the Jesuits in the 16th 17th century. This chronology, regarded by many as the absolute historical truth, contains many gaps and repetitions. Most major historical events (as well as personalities and even places) have several phantom duplicates arbitrarily dated to various antediluvian epochs and presumed completely unrelated to one another - the Trojan War and the First Crusade are a perfect example. Our entire view of the so-called "Antiquity" and the Middle Ages changes radically; history becomes streamlined and unencumbered by all the dark ages, lost empires and mystical cyclic patterns that afflict the official version. The duplicates all roll into a single historical reality - Classical Greek poleis become one with the mediaeval Crusader states, ancient Egyptian paganism identifies as Coptic Christianity, and historical Troy, Constantinople and Jerusalem turn out to be the same city on the Bosporus, which we know as Istanbul. The city in Palestine known as Jerusalem today remained a nondescript Arabic settlement called El-Kuds until the 18th century. There isn't a single Crusader map in existence that would locate Jerusalem in Palestine (or indeed give us any detailed information about that region) - unlike modern historians, mediaeval cartographers knew the location of the Holy Land perfectly well. Sounds absurd? Not if you have read "History: Fiction or Science?" by Professor Anatoly Fomenko - a brilliant mathematician and a true scientist to the core - unconfined by dogmatic thinking and determined to get to the bare historical truth at any cost. The Mongolian Horde was merely the Russian army. According to the official version of history, Russia remained under the political and military yoke of the Mongols for many centuries on end. The term "Mongol" is usually assumed to have always meant the same thing - however, this turns out to be incorrect. Bear in mind that Mongolia didn't exist as an independent state until the early 20th century! The word "Mongol" simply meant "Great One" - its association with the nomadic tribes hailing from the steppes north of China is a later invention...There was no such thing as the Tartar and Mongol invasion followed by two centuries of slavery. The so-called "Tartars and Mongols" were the actual ancestors of the modern Russians, living in a bilingual state with Arabic spoken as freely as Russian. The ancient Russian state was governed by a double structure of civil and military authorities. The hordes were actually professional armies with a tradition of lifelong conscription (the recruitment being the so-called "blood tax"). Their "invasions" were punitive operations against the regions that attempted tax evasion. Russian history as we know it today is a blatant forgery concocted by a host of German scientists brought to Russia by the usurper dynasty of the Romanovs.
Comments
mesimeriaris ::: Favorites Mithec's videos are as false and twisted as they could be but I really enjoyed watching them.Conspirasism can really be fun.If some people believe in a fairy tale,it aint the fairy tales's fault... 07-10-04 11:39:48 __________________________________________________
italianchappy ::: Favorites I see now from the other videos this author rewrites all classical chronology and all history. WOW. He has to convince the historical community first. If he succeed will be the greatest historical scoop of all times. Good luck. 07-09-28 10:44:43 __________________________________________________
italianchappy ::: Favorites Absurd. Please read Viriglius' Aeneid, telling telling the mithical Roman history when survivors of Troy goes in Italy and their ancestors gave birth to Rome. All this well before Christ (and Mohammad a fortiori). 07-09-28 10:34:39 __________________________________________________
shooter1k ::: Favorites Proganda 07-09-28 10:03:47 __________________________________________________
spartanwarrior1 ::: Favorites denial of historical truth..there is no connection between ancient troy and the crusades...bullshit 100% and then some conceived by some sick individual. 07-09-14 09:55:35 __________________________________________________
carlie9k ::: Favorites The book will change your entire perception, but it will give you another wrong perception 07-08-24 07:57:41 __________________________________________________
carlie9k ::: Favorites another manipulation and distortion of the truth, so that we would go on a wild goose chase 07-08-24 07:55:14 __________________________________________________
Guitibaca ::: Favorites Talk about rewriting history. The Hebrew scholars and Spanish priests kept some of the most complete and accurate records in those early times. And somehow all of them missed the news that Jesus actually lived in 1053 AD? I guess the Spaniards really didn't know that Jesus was actually Hhe-Soosss, the tailor. You really would have to be a Bush supporter to believe that crap. 07-08-02 20:32:33 __________________________________________________
jaewoovoodoo ::: Favorites This is the most ridiculous and moronic idea I have ever heard. Just because we may lack a plethora of Western records of theis time period does not mean that we have none. There are records available from other areas of culture i.e. China to support a multi-millenial timeline of history. This is really just farcical. And is that a Speak and Spell narrating? 07-07-27 23:06:42 __________________________________________________
mithec ::: Favorites Ancient China is a myth. The compilation of the so-called Ancient Chinese History is reliably datable to the XVII-XVIII century only. It is perfectly recognizable as the Ancient European history, reworked and transcribed in hieroglyphs as yet another historical transplantation, this time performed on the Chinese soil by the loving Jesuit hands. 07-07-14 05:22:57 __________________________________________________